Confidence
Performing under scrutiny
Choking under pressure has identifiable mechanisms, and the interventions that help are specific rather than general encouragement.

Performing worse when it matters is common enough to have a substantial research literature, and the mechanisms identified suggest different responses for different people.
The two main accounts
Distraction. Pressure introduces competing demands on working memory — worry about the outcome, self-monitoring, awareness of the audience — which leaves less capacity for the task.
This account predicts that pressure harms tasks that load working memory heavily: mental arithmetic, problem solving, anything requiring holding several things in mind.
Explicit monitoring. Pressure directs attention to the execution of a skill that normally runs automatically, and attending to an automatic process disrupts it.
This account predicts that pressure harms well-practised motor skills specifically — the golf putt, the musical passage, the presentation you have delivered fifty times.
Both effects have experimental support, and they apply to different kinds of task, which is why the same advice does not work for everyone.
What follows from that
For working-memory-heavy tasks, the intervention is to reduce the competing load.
Writing down worries before the task has been found in several studies to improve performance under pressure, particularly for people high in anxiety. The proposed mechanism is offloading the rumination.
Reducing what must be held in mind — notes, a written structure, external prompts — helps for the same reason.
For automatic motor skills, the intervention is to prevent attention landing on the mechanics.
An external focus of attention — on the effect rather than on the body — has reasonably consistent support. Thinking about the target rather than the hands.
A brief routine performed before execution occupies attention and reduces monitoring, which is part of why pre-performance routines are ubiquitous in sport and are not superstition.
Reappraisal
The intervention with the broadest applicability.
The physical signs of anxiety and excitement are largely identical: raised heart rate, adrenaline, heightened alertness.
Studies instructing people to say they are excited, rather than to calm down, have found improved performance on public speaking and similar tasks.
The proposed reason is that anxiety and excitement are both high-arousal states, so moving between them requires only relabelling, whereas calming down requires shifting arousal itself — which is difficult and takes effort that competes with the task.
Preparation that actually transfers
Practise under conditions resembling the performance. Practising in private and performing in public means the performance is the first time the skill has been executed under scrutiny.
Rehearsing in front of one person, or recording yourself, introduces a mild version of the pressure and produces measurable transfer.
Overlearn the opening. The first minute is where anxiety is highest and where working memory is most compromised.
Knowing the opening so thoroughly that it requires no capacity gives the arousal time to settle before anything demanding arrives.
Plan for the failure mode. Deciding in advance what you do if you lose your place removes the catastrophic interpretation, which is most of the disruption.
The audience assumption
Worth correcting because it drives a great deal of the anxiety.
Research on the spotlight effect consistently finds that people overestimate how much others notice about them — appearance, mistakes, nervousness.
Related work on the illusion of transparency finds that people overestimate how visible their internal states are to observers. Your racing heart is not apparent.
Which means the specific fear — that everyone can see you are nervous — is generally inaccurate, and knowing that is modestly helpful.
When it is more than performance anxiety
Worth naming clearly.
Where anxiety about performance or social situations is persistent, causes avoidance of opportunities, or produces significant distress, that is a recognised condition with effective treatments — and cognitive behavioural approaches have a strong evidence base for it.
The techniques above are for ordinary nerves. They are not a substitute for treatment, and treating a clinical anxiety as a preparation problem delays help that works.
General information about wellbeing, not psychological advice. Persistent performance or social anxiety warrants assessment by a qualified professional.
Also by Priya Venkatesan
- Reputation, and how it is actually builtWork & Career
- Remote and hybrid work, honestlyWork & Career
- Confidence and competence are different thingsConfidence
- Delegating without abandoningWork & Career





