Peppy Talks
Small changes, honestly assessed

Confidence

Performing under scrutiny

Choking under pressure has identifiable mechanisms, and the interventions that help are specific rather than general encouragement.

A contemplative young woman looks out a window with a reflective expression, indoors.
A contemplative young woman looks out a window with a reflective expression, indoors. · Photo via Pexels
Health information notice. General information — not a substitute for professional advice. Read the full disclaimer.

Performing worse when it matters is common enough to have a substantial research literature, and the mechanisms identified suggest different responses for different people.

The two main accounts

Distraction. Pressure introduces competing demands on working memory — worry about the outcome, self-monitoring, awareness of the audience — which leaves less capacity for the task.

This account predicts that pressure harms tasks that load working memory heavily: mental arithmetic, problem solving, anything requiring holding several things in mind.

Explicit monitoring. Pressure directs attention to the execution of a skill that normally runs automatically, and attending to an automatic process disrupts it.

This account predicts that pressure harms well-practised motor skills specifically — the golf putt, the musical passage, the presentation you have delivered fifty times.

Both effects have experimental support, and they apply to different kinds of task, which is why the same advice does not work for everyone.

What follows from that

For working-memory-heavy tasks, the intervention is to reduce the competing load.

Writing down worries before the task has been found in several studies to improve performance under pressure, particularly for people high in anxiety. The proposed mechanism is offloading the rumination.

Reducing what must be held in mind — notes, a written structure, external prompts — helps for the same reason.

For automatic motor skills, the intervention is to prevent attention landing on the mechanics.

An external focus of attention — on the effect rather than on the body — has reasonably consistent support. Thinking about the target rather than the hands.

A brief routine performed before execution occupies attention and reduces monitoring, which is part of why pre-performance routines are ubiquitous in sport and are not superstition.

Reappraisal

The intervention with the broadest applicability.

The physical signs of anxiety and excitement are largely identical: raised heart rate, adrenaline, heightened alertness.

Studies instructing people to say they are excited, rather than to calm down, have found improved performance on public speaking and similar tasks.

The proposed reason is that anxiety and excitement are both high-arousal states, so moving between them requires only relabelling, whereas calming down requires shifting arousal itself — which is difficult and takes effort that competes with the task.

Preparation that actually transfers

Practise under conditions resembling the performance. Practising in private and performing in public means the performance is the first time the skill has been executed under scrutiny.

Rehearsing in front of one person, or recording yourself, introduces a mild version of the pressure and produces measurable transfer.

Overlearn the opening. The first minute is where anxiety is highest and where working memory is most compromised.

Knowing the opening so thoroughly that it requires no capacity gives the arousal time to settle before anything demanding arrives.

Plan for the failure mode. Deciding in advance what you do if you lose your place removes the catastrophic interpretation, which is most of the disruption.

The audience assumption

Worth correcting because it drives a great deal of the anxiety.

Research on the spotlight effect consistently finds that people overestimate how much others notice about them — appearance, mistakes, nervousness.

Related work on the illusion of transparency finds that people overestimate how visible their internal states are to observers. Your racing heart is not apparent.

Which means the specific fear — that everyone can see you are nervous — is generally inaccurate, and knowing that is modestly helpful.

When it is more than performance anxiety

Worth naming clearly.

Where anxiety about performance or social situations is persistent, causes avoidance of opportunities, or produces significant distress, that is a recognised condition with effective treatments — and cognitive behavioural approaches have a strong evidence base for it.

The techniques above are for ordinary nerves. They are not a substitute for treatment, and treating a clinical anxiety as a preparation problem delays help that works.

General information about wellbeing, not psychological advice. Persistent performance or social anxiety warrants assessment by a qualified professional.

Priya Venkatesan
Work & Communication, Peppy Talks

Priya coaches senior teams through difficult conversations and reports that the hard part is almost never the words.

More from Priya →

Also by Priya Venkatesan

Confidence

Knowing what you are actually good at

Self-assessment is unreliable in known directions, and the corrections are external rather than introspective.

Priya Venkatesan··3 min read

Confidence

Self-compassion, without the softness

A construct with a reasonable evidence base and a name that puts people off, whose main finding is that self-criticism does not work.

Nadia Okonjo··3 min read

Focus & Attention

Attention and anxiety

Worry consumes the same capacity that concentration requires, which is why anxious people struggle with tasks they are entirely capable of.

Nadia Okonjo··3 min read

Habits

Habit stacking, and where it breaks down

Attaching a new behaviour to an existing one is genuinely effective, provided the anchor is more reliable than most people assume theirs is.

Sam Delacroix··3 min read